0.5 C
Munich

Twitter sues Texas AG over retaliation for Trump ban

Must read

DALLAS (AP) – Twitter has filed a lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, claiming that the Republican Party used its office to seek revenge for banning the account of former President Donald Trump after the US Capitol riots.

In the days following the deadly January uprising, Paxton announced an investigation into Twitter’s four other major tech companies, which he called “the president’s seemingly agreed de-platform.” The Prosecutor General’s Office has demanded that companies produce a number of records related to their content policy և internal communications.

Twitter responded on Monday with a federal lawsuit alleging that Paxton was trying to punish him for taking Trump’s account off the net. The decision, which the social media company says is free speech. The judge asked the judge to declare that the decision was subject to the First Amendment, in effect, to terminate the Paxton investigation.

“Paxton has made it clear that he will use all the weight of his office, including his extensive investigative powers, to retaliate against Twitter for editorial decisions with which it disagrees,” the company’s lawyers wrote in a lawsuit in Northern California. ,

Speakers at the Paxton office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Twitter’s backlash comes as states, in addition to federal lawmakers and governments outside the United States, put pressure on tech companies that they see as gaining traction over the past decade. This includes antitrust, antitrust, Internet privacy laws, and attempts to regulate how Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms regulate their sites.

In December, Paxton led 10 Republican attorneys who sued Google over its illegal monopoly on digital advertising unrelated to Facebook.

In almost two dozen states, GOP politicians have also introduced a bill that would allow civil lawsuits against systems, which they call “censorship” of positions. This almost always means what they consider to be the censorship of conservative or Christian religious views.

While there is no evidence that tech companies are biased against the Conservatives, the story has been popular since President Trump was elected and has only been heard throughout his tenure. After banning the Capitol riots on January 6, Trump banned Twitter for life and temporarily suspended Facebook, only to strengthen it.

At the start of the investigation, Paxton quoted First Amendment as saying that ousting Trump by tech companies “freezes free speech” and “completely silences” those who disagree.

However, Twitter, like Paxton’s other targeted companies, including Facebook, Apple, Google, and Amazon, is a private company, so the First Amendment does not apply to its decisions on what materials to allow. services. Unlike the government, Twitter is allowed to silence people. For a long time, the company had taken Trump and other world leaders out of its rules – against personal attacks, hate speech and other behaviors. But after five people were killed during the Capitol riots, the company said Trump’s tweets signaled a glorification of violence as plans for future armed protests over the inauguration of President-elect Biden circulated online.

The Twitter lawsuit comes after Paxton faced other legal challenges, including a Federal Bureau of Investigation investigation into allegations that he used his office to benefit a wealthy donor.

He is also awaiting trial on unrelated securities fraud charges starting in 2015. Paxton pleaded not guilty և The case has been pending for years due to legal challenges.

___

Ortuta reported from Auckland, California.

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article