For years, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has been telling the public that fully autonomous Tesla are just around the corner, taking a vacation of no more than a year or two.
The company tells a completely different story to regulators.
In official correspondence with the California Department of Motor Transport, Tesla’s attorneys recently admitted that Tesla was selling the $ 10,000 version because full self-management capacity was not in fact capable of full self-management. “At the moment, neither the aircraft nor the FSD capability is an autonomous system,” Tesla lawyer Eric Williams said in a December 28 letter to DMV, although that could change.
Although not soon. Musk has prepared tweeting plans for the main release of Full Self-Driving software. But Williams told DMV that “we do not expect significant improvements” that would allow it to be fully autonomous, that the “final release” of the current feature set would allow Tesla to stand in the spotlight, turn left and right without human input. »: will continue to be the SAE Level 2 advanced driver assistance feature. ” In plain English, this means that the vehicle can not be driven on its own, at any time, without the constant attention of the human driver.
The e-mails were leaked following a post by Plainsite Transparency International. They show that DMV is questioning Tesla about its Full Self-Driving technology requirements, asking the company why it did not apply for a driverless car test permit, as six other automakers have done; companies:
Bryant Walker Smith, an expert in autonomous car law at the University of South Carolina, described Tesla emails as “fragile.” He said: “It is so obvious that there is a discrepancy between what Tesla says and its marketing role,” its engineers and lawyers told DMV. “One side exaggerates those expectations and the other massages them.”
Although “dirty words” are used throughout the industry to describe the technology of robotic machines. “From driverless autonomy to autonomy to driver assistance, there is no ambiguity about the word ‘full-fledged’ in ‘full self-government,'” Smith said. It means a car that drives itself. “There is a difference when the doctor tells you that you are healthy, he says that you are completely healthy,” he said.
Musk has a basis for promoting full self-government. The $ 10,000 option is a balm for Tesla’s revenue, or it’s unclear how much it’s. The company does not start selling FSD. Musk sells to buyers with the idea that autonomous Tesla cars will value themselves.
In April 2019, when there was no cash at Tesla, Musk said that 1 million fully autonomous robotics would be on the way by the end of 2020, earning money for their owners. A few weeks later, Tesla sold $ 3 billion worth of Tesla shares to end its cash crisis. By the end of 2020, no robotics had been built. DMV email The mail suggests that they will not be available soon.
Tesla does not have a media relations department Լ can not comment.
E-mail exchanges raise an important public safety issue. Does the company conduct driverless car experiments that put the public և Tesla’s own customers at undue risk?
The so-called Full Self-Driving capability is the evolution of the company’s Autopilot technology, the main functions of which are adaptive cruise control: automatic steering. The FSD version comes with a lane change on highways with automatic parking և traffic lights ավտոմ automatic stop signs.
The latest iteration is Autosteer on city streets; When activated, the car can automatically turn left or right after stopping at a traffic light or stop sign. This feature is limited to the “early access program”, which Tesla said last December that there were a total of about 150 Tesla employees, about 50 unemployed. The responsibilities and responsibilities of these participants are similar to those of the infamous test driver in 2018, when a test Volvo equipped with a Uber self-driving system failed to recognize a pedestrian crossing the street and killed him. The driver, who allegedly diverted the phone, was charged last year with manslaughter.
The Autosteer city-street function is scheduled for later this year.
DMV email The email reveals that Full Self-Driving is, at best, in progress. In a letter to DMV, Tesla’s lawyer Williams noted that “there are circumstances” that the system is unable to recognize or respond to. “These include static objects – road debris, crashed vehicles, construction lanes, large uncontrolled intersections with multiple entrances, traffic jams, adverse weather, difficult or adversarial vehicles on the road, unpaved roads.” As a result, Williams wrote, “the driver retains responsibility.”
Musk said that Teslas with automated features is less likely to crash than those that do not. But the company has not yet released raw data to support this claim, it has rejected academic researchers who offered to evaluate the data held by it.
Tesla crashes regularly make headlines, although only insurance companies are able to determine how they compare their crash rate to other vehicles, information they do not publish. Police, courts, and security officials should rely on Tesla to verify whether Autopilot or Full Self-Driving was involved after the accident, as the information is owned by Tesla.
The state charter, which includes the installation of autonomous vehicles, states that the vehicle must be able to drive independently “without the constant supervision or active supervision of an individual” in order to be considered in the process of autonomous DMV clearance.
Smith said the language of the charter may justify the DMV, which requires Tesla to apply for a license, but it may also justify the transfer of the DMV to Tesla. For now, Tesla can continue to have it in two ways. Advertising the level of its autonomy to the consumers, at the same time not seeing the regulators.