NASHVIL, Tenia. (AP) – Dr. Michael Cakovich has treated his department for pregnant women. So when Republican lawmakers in the United States began aborting abortion, what they call the “first fetal heartbeat,” he was outraged.
This is because at the point where advanced technology can detect that first concussion within six weeks, the embryo is not yet a fetus; it has no heart. The embryo is called the fetus, which begins in the 11th week of pregnancy, say medical experts.
“You can not hear this ‘vibration’, it can only be seen on ultrasound,” said Cakovich, a specialist in obstetric medicine at Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, where about 5,300 babies are born each year.
However, bans on “fetal heartbeat” have been enacted in 13 states, including Cakovich’s native Ohio. None of them came into force, և the courts overturned or temporarily blocked only the recently adopted ones. “One of the most restrictive, signed by Tennessee Republican Gov. Bill Lee last year, will go to the U.S. District 6 Court of Appeals on Thursday.”
Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Do not hesitate to ask the Conservative Coalition for a Conservative coalition to oust President Donald Trump. 1973 Roe v. Wade verdict.
The idea that abortion “stops the heartbeat” at six weeks’ gestation contributed to measures that outweighed the constitutional concerns in the states they supported.
The creator of the concept, anti-contraceptive activist et Annette Folger Porter, in an e-mail to her supporters last year, spoke openly about her strategy.
“The motto ‘Abortion stops the beating heart’ has long been an effective means of highlighting the injustice and inhumanity of abortion,” Porter wrote in the Ohio State Heart Protection Act.
He found that hearts were easily marketed.
In his ten-year struggle to pass Ohio law, Porter stepped up his lobbying efforts with hearty balloons and bears. He urged supporters to “take heart” when faced with obstacles, urged lawmakers to “have heart” and vote “yes” despite their constitutional concerns.
Then Republican Gov. John von Kasich twice vetoed Ohio’s “heartbeat bill,” citing constitutional issues. His GOP successor, Governor Mike Devine, signed it in 2019 amid a flurry of similar bills that year.
For now, abortion remains legal in all 50 states, although 43 have some restrictions on the procedure after the fetus becomes viable outside the womb, usually within 24 to 28 weeks.
John von Culhan, a law professor at the University of Wieden, who heads the Institute for Family Health Law and Policy, said the marketing of the abortion lobby “heartbeat” legislation was “an attempt to make the fruit human”.
“The heartbeat literally pulls the heartbeat, it makes you feel, ‘Why are you doing this?’ “Do not worry that the embryo is not there yet,” he said.
However, lawyers are quick to point out that medical inaccuracies are not a legal argument.
“Legislators are free to define what they want and give it the force of law,” said Andrew Koppelman, a professor of law at Northwestern University. “The reality of medical science is not limited to what the legislature can do. “What limits what the legislature can do is women’s constitutional rights.”
In the war on abortion, however, battles have erupted in the past over politically charged, inaccurate or vague terminology used in abortion laws.
“Dismemberment abortion” is a term used by opponents to extend հան evacuation, a common method of terminating a second trimester. They use “partial birth abortion” to describe what is medically called intact dilation.
Abortion rights groups copy the “six-week ban on abortion” laws, although the bills do not provide for such a provision.
“It is very common to use non-medical language to speak publicly about medical procedures,” said David Cohen, a law professor at the Clyne School of Law at Drexel University.
“The law needs to be precise to know exactly what is being regulated,” Cohen said. “So in medicine it would be using medical terminology.”
Fetal medicine expert Cakovich says that the current “heartbeat laws” are based only on “our amazing technological advances” that allow us to detect the earliest signs of fetal heart activity, “և nothing else”.
A 2013 pioneering study by the University of Leeds, for example, found that although four distinct chambers appear in a person’s heart from the eighth week of pregnancy, they remain a “disorganized tissue mess” until the end of the 20th week, much later. than expected
Opponents of abortion do not see it that way, seeing the use of antiseptic medical terms to describe pregnancy as their own political strategy.
The hosts of CareCast, a non-profit Care Net-sponsored podcast, called on the media last year to use the words “pulse” or “fetal heartbeat” instead of “heartbeat”, accusing them of using “euphemisms”. in: և “Oral gymnastics” to not humanize the future.
“They are literally inventing new ways to talk about the heartbeat, so that they can try to avoid giving the fetus any human features,” said Vincent Di Caro, the group’s general director of awareness. President and CEO Roland Warren argues that abortion advocacy groups use medical terms to “maximize atrocities” against human life. He equated this with the dehumanization of the Jews by the Nazis.
Kulhane says vague or inaccurate language can be a powerful argument against “heartbreaking laws” in the courts. If the fight ever goes beyond the influence of the laws that exist on the constitutional right of a woman to have an abortion.
“Courts are really vigilant these days about looking at the rules to make sure they are notifying what exactly is wrong,” said a law professor at Wiedener University.
“Because we do not want people to have to guess and then find out they are on the wrong side of the law.”
Smith reported from Columbus, Ohio.