There will be no goal videos, lineup announcements, club shouts or even title celebrations.
A four-day silence by English football leagues, clubs, players on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram began on Friday in protest of widespread racist violence.
Such anger throughout the game means that if Manchester City win the Premier League Cup on Sunday, it will not celebrate the title on social media.
Who is boycotting?
Initially, there was a joint boycott by the Football Association, the Premier League, the English Football League, the Women’s Super League, the Women’s League, the player, the manager, the referees, Kick It Out, the anti-discrimination group, the Women in Football group. Ahead of the 1400 Greenwich Mean Time boycott on Monday morning, other English sports, including cricket, rugby, tennis and horse racing, said they would remain silent on social media. FIFA, UEFA և The British Premier League broadcasters also said they would not post online messages for four days.
In 2019, the England Players’ Union staged a 24-hour boycott of social media called the “Enough is Enough” campaign – demanding tougher action to stop sending hate mail to its members online. It did not come without zero tolerance. For Facebook owner Instagram, a racist post is not enough to immediately stop a user.
“It’s awful,” said Simone Pound, head of the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA). “When we first went to them after the ‘Enough’ campaign, I had a mix of examples from abuse players. We had in the room (Leicester captain) Wes Morgan, who was talking on a personal level. There was the word N-everywhere, monkey emojis everywhere և they were like. “We are really sorry. It does not contradict our community guidelines. ”
According to Pound, not much has improved in two years.
“Since we first met them, they think it’s not a good answer or a response,” Pound said. “However, we still see և we know that these words, emotions are used terribly for players every day, և they are not always quickly removed. “Sometimes they go up six months after the report.”
Instagram’s moves to eradicate racism have focused more on actions against offensive direct messages than on public ones.
The PFA found that 31 of the 56 racist-discriminatory tweets remained on Twitter as of Thursday, despite reports from the previous year. Like Facebook, Twitter will not interview anyone to discuss allegations that they escalate discriminatory content քայլ steps to remove violent users.
A study by Fare, an anti-discrimination network affiliated with Belgium-based artificial intelligence company Text, found that 157 players involved in the final eight of the Champions League and Europa League last August were discriminated against on Twitter. Six months later, 66% of discriminatory tweets remained online, as did 71% of their accounts, Fair said, noting that while ethnic minority players were more likely to be subjected to racist violence, players were sent to homophobic abuse during the game.
The British government is introducing a law to ensure online security, which could lead to fines for social media companies for not toughening against racism.
“We could see fines of up to 10% of annual world turnover,” Secretary of Culture Oliver Dowden wrote in a Friday issue of The Sun. “For a company like Facebook or YouTube, it could be billions.”
Prohibited by clubs
Manchester United announced on Friday that six fans have been banned from using racial violence on social media for Tottenham striker Son Heung-min. In a review on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, United revealed that 3,300 abusive posts were targeted at its players between September 2019 and February 2021. Chelsea said on Friday that the supporter was banned for 10 days for anti-Semitic messages.
The PFA is preparing for more shutdowns on social media.
“I personally feel this may be the first in a series of boycotts,” Pound said. “If necessary, we can do it every week. This does not disappear. They need to listen to us. ”
More AP football. Https://apnews.com/hub/soccer և https://twitter.com/AP_Sports