WASHINGTON (AP) – Even before President Biden unveiled his $ 2.3 trillion infrastructure bill, congressional committees were laying the groundwork for a major public outpost to spend the summer.
They held hearings to hear from industry experts and senior administration officials. They introduced a number of bills. They asked lawmakers from both parties to submit their ideas for specific projects before Thursday.
And now begins the difficult part, putting together an ambitious end product that can pass the so closely divided House: Senate.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi described July 4 as the day she would like to approve the infrastructure bill, but that deadline could be the end of the month.
It is possible that individual committees will advance their legislation, and then a comprehensive bill will be drafted from this work, although the process of adopting Biden’s plan is not yet regulated. The assistant was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter, he discussed it, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The various components of a sweeping program will probably be known. Biden wants $ 25 billion to be spent on upgrading the country’s airports, $ 115 billion on more major bridges and roads, and $ 17 billion on port waterways, for example.
Potential Roads, Bridges և Democratic chairmen of transit investment oversight committees aim to pass a bill to redefine the highway, which is a key element of infrastructure removal, before Commemoration Day before the commission.
To sweeten the prospect of bipartisan support, Democrats are allowing lawmakers to make their mark through so-called headphones, now called “member-designated projects,” which will donate some of the infrastructure spending to state-specific projects in their home states. ,
Lawmakers can begin submitting their claims Thursday through the House Transport and Infrastructure Committee, which is working on a road transit bill. Policy change. Banning the use of the ear in recent years may intensify efforts to reach an agreement on the infrastructure bill, but other factors, such as paying for it, are likely to play a much bigger role.
Key Republicans and influential business groups are lobbying heavily against Biden’s preferred method of paying for infrastructure, mainly raising the income tax rate to 28%. During Donald Trump’s presidency, tax cuts were reduced to 21%, from 35%. Republicans do not see the proposed increase as mediocre.
“It’s called infrastructure. But there will be more money inside the Trojan horse. And massive tax increases on all productive parts of our economy, “said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in his hometown of Kentucky on Wednesday.
McConnell had questions about possible money, particularly for bridges, but said he did not see it as a moment of bipartisanship in Washington.
Still, Democrat lawmakers and the White House have great prospects for some bipartisan support, even if it seems unlikely. Biden’s first major bill, the $ 1.9 trillion COVID-19 aid program, received no Republican support.
“The American rescue program was a little different because it was an emergency. “It’s because of the emergency that we’re still struggling on our way, it’s true we’re taking control of the epidemic, getting people back to work,” White House spokesman En Psaki told MSNBC. “This is a big job bill, but we have a little more time to negotiate, to discuss, to hear if people have a better idea of what the proposals are and how to pay for it.”
Republican Sen. Sam Graves Missouri, a Republican ombudsman, said he hoped Congress would develop infrastructure legislation in the coming weeks that could receive bipartisan support, but Biden’s plan is unlikely to do so.
“The president’s bill is a multi-thousand dollar party procurement list in terms of progressive priorities, all of which are classified as ‘infrastructure’, paid for by a large increase in job-threatening taxes,” Graves said.
If Democrats fail to get a bill backed by Republicans, Democrat leaders are likely to follow the same budgetary procedure as the COVID-19 bailout bill by a simple majority in the Senate.
Administration officials sidestepped the question of whether Democrats would go that route, saying Biden wanted to understand that he had a plan, would listen openly to what others thought, before adding that he was uncompromising about “the urgency of the moment.” »Survey.